E. Jane Sidnell of Rose LLP recently commented on two decisions of the Court of Appeal of Alberta.
The first case comment deals with the decision in Impact Painting Ltd v Man-Shield (Alta) Construction Inc, 2019 ABCA 57 and reviews the following issues: when extras should be allowed, what is required to prove a back charge, and what portion of the lien bond cost can be assessed against the lien claimant who has liened for more than the ultimate judgment. Download
The second case comment addresses Capital Steel Inc v Chandos Construction Ltd, 2019 ABCA 32 and focuses on the Court's treatment of the common law anti-deprivation rule. Download